Kepastian Hukum Atas Pemeriksaan Setempat Terhadap Sengketa Tanah Dalam Perkara Perdata
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69989/k6jhry02Kata Kunci:
Kepastian Hukum, Majelis Hakim, Pemeriksaan Setempat, Sengketa, TanahAbstrak
Penyelesaian sengketa hak atas tanah di Pengadilan Negeri sebelum sampai pada pemeriksaan dengan agenda pembuktian, maka kepada para pihak berperkara akan dilakukan mediasi. Hakim, panitera dan juru sita bersama para pihak menuju lokasi objek yang diperiksa dan melakukan pemeriksaan. Yang dimintai keterangan adalah pihak penggugat sesuai isi gugatannya. Rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini adalah 1. Apakah pemeriksaan setempat terhadap objek sengketa tanah dalam perkara perdata telah memberikan kepastian hukum? 2. Apakah implikasi hukum dari pemeriksaan setempat terhadap suatu objek perkara perdata? 3. Bagaimana kepastian hukum dalam pengaturan ke depan pada pemeriksaan setempat terhadap objek tanah dalam perkara perdata. Hasil penelitian mengatakan Pemeriksaan setempat berdasarkan Pasal 153 HIR, Pasal 180 RBg, Pasal 211 – 214 Rv dan SEMA No. 7 tahun 2001 belum mengatur secara rinci mekanisme pemeriksaan setempat dilapangan. Pemeriksaan setempat masih rancu, apakah merupakan alat bukti yang memiliki kekuatan dalam pembuktian atau pemeriksaan setempat tidak termasuk sebagai kategori alat bukti.
Unduhan
Referensi
Babcock, B. A., Massaro, T. M., & Spaulding, N. W. (2021). Civil Procedure: Cases and Problems. Aspen Publishing.
Baihaqi, I. F. (2020). Urgensi Pemeriksaan Setempat (Descente) Dalam Sistem Pembuktian Perkara Permohonan Izin Poligami (Studi Putusan Izin Poligami Pengadilan Agama Tulungagung Tahun (2016-2019). UNIVERSITAS ISLAM NEGERI SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.
Benu, M. O. (2023). Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Pemeriksaan Setempat Terhadap Objek Sengketa Tidak Bergerak Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Perkara Perdata Di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Negeri Oelamasi. Jurnal Hukum Online, 1(4), 77–90.
Gélinas, F., Camion, C., Bates, K., Anstis, S., Piché, C., Khan, M., & Grant, E. (2015). Foundations of civil justice. Springer.
Glynn, A. N., & Sen, M. (2015). Identifying judicial empathy: does having daughters cause judges to rule for women’s issues? American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 37–54.
Guest, J. W. (2017). Justice as Lawfulness and Equity as a Virtue in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. The Review of Politics, 79(1), 1–22.
Hamidi, J. (2006). Makna dan Kedudukan Hukum Naskah Proklamasi 17 Agustus 1945 dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia. Risalah Hukum, 68–86.
Harahap, M. Y. (2017). Hukum acara perdata: tentang gugatan, persidangan, penyitaan, pembuktian, dan putusan pengadilan. Sinar Grafika.
Huneeus, A. (2013). International criminal law by other means: the quasi-criminal jurisdiction of the Human Rights Courts. American Journal of International Law, 107(1), 1–44.
Ibrahim, A.-S., Abubakari, M., Akanbang, B. A. A., & Kepe, T. (2022). Resolving land conflicts through alternative dispute resolution: Exploring the motivations and challenges in Ghana. Land Use Policy, 120, 106272.
Law, D. S. (2017). The anatomy of a conservative court: judicial review in Japan. In Public Law in East Asia (pp. 3–44). Routledge.
Mappasessu, M. (2023). Penerapan Teori Pembuktian dalam Sengketa Milik Tanah Agar Putusan Makin Efektif. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(2), 18891–18901.
Marzuki, P. M. (2016). Legal Research Revised Edition (12th Printing). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Moeliono, A. M. (1990). Kamus besar bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Panjaitan, D. S., & Puryanto, P. (2022). Penyelesaian Sengketa Pelayanan Publik Oleh Lembaga Ombudsman Republik Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekotrans & Erudisi, 2(1), 88–96.
Robertson, B., Vignaux, G. A., & Berger, C. E. H. (2016). Interpreting evidence: evaluating forensic science in the courtroom. John Wiley & Sons.
Rosalina, M. (2018). Pengaturan pemeriksaan setempat (Decentee) dalam peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Kaidah: Media Komunikasi Dan Informasi Hukum Dan Masyarakat, 18(1), 1–10.
Scoones, I. (2013). Livelihoods perspectives and rural development. In Critical perspectives in rural development studies (pp. 159–184). Routledge.
Wiggins, D. (2013). Claims of need. In Morality and Objectivity (Routledge Revivals) (pp. 149–202). Routledge.
Wignjosoebroto, S. (2013). Hukum Konsep dan Metode.
Wixted, J. T., & Wells, G. L. (2017). The relationship between eyewitness confidence and identification accuracy: A new synthesis. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 18(1), 10–65.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2024 Marthen Benu, Moh. Ali, Rahmadi Indra Tektona (Author)
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
An author who publishes in the journal "Jurnal Ilmiah Ekotrans & Erudisi" agrees to the following terms:
Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
All materials in this site are protected by the law. It is prohibited to quote a part of or all of this website contents for commercial purposes without the permission or consent of the editors.
If anyone finds one article or more in this journal violate or potentially violate one’s copyrights, please report to us through e-mail of Principle Contact.
Legal-formal aspects of accessing any information and manuscript in this journal website refer to the provision of license Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC BY-SA). Read more about the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.
All information available in 'Jurnal Ilmiah Ekotrans & Erudisi' is academic in nature. 'Jurnal Ilmiah Ekotrans & Erudisi' is not responsible for loss due to the abuse of information in the website.
Information
Notice about change in the copyright policy of the journal 'Jurnal Ilmiah Ekotrans & Erudisi' : "From Volume 1, Nomor 1 onwards the copyright of the article published in the journal 'Jurnal Ilmiah Ekotrans & Erudisi' will be retained by the author"
Privacy Statement
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.
Cara Mengutip
