The Essence of Legislation in Realizing a Legal State Based on Justice and Welfare
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69989/pw0yem58Keywords:
Rule of Law, Legislation, Justice, Welfare, Legal Certainty, Accountability, Transparency, Community ParticipationAbstract
This research examines the essence of legislation in realizing a legal state that focuses on justice and people's welfare. The rule of law is a fundamental basis for achieving justice and prosperity. Legislation, as the main instrument of the rule of law, is central to translating the values of justice and welfare into concrete practice. This research explores the definition and characteristics of the rule of law and the crucial role of legislation in upholding the supremacy of law, creating legal certainty, and realizing justice and prosperity for all people. Furthermore, this research identifies fundamental principles that must be realized in legislation to achieve justice and prosperity, such as, Rule of law and legal certainty, Justice and equality before the law, Benefit and welfare of the people, Accountability and transparency and Community participation in drafting legislation. This research also discusses challenges and solutions in realizing just and prosperous legislation. Factors that hinder the realization of just and prosperous legislation are analyzed, and efforts to overcome these challenges are proposed.
Downloads
References
Bedner, A. (2010). An elementary approach to the rule of law. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 2(1), 48–74. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1876404510100037
Buyse, A. (2018). Squeezing civic space: Restrictions on civil society organizations and the linkages with human rights. The International Journal of Human Rights, 22(8), 966–988. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2018.1492916
Creswell, J. W. (2014). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE publications.
Gill, G. N., & Ramachandran, G. (2021). Sustainability transformations, environmental rule of law and the Indian judiciary: connecting the dots through climate change litigation. Environmental Law Review, 23(3), 228–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614529211031203
Jakab, A., & Kirchmair, L. (2021). How to develop the EU justice scoreboard into a rule of law index: using an existing tool in the EU rule of law crisis in a more efficient way. German Law Journal, 22(6), 936–955. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2021.46
McGregor, L., Murray, D., & Ng, V. (2019). International human rights law as a framework for algorithmic accountability. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 68(2), 309–343. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589319000046
Muhammad, M., & Husen, L. O. (2019). State Civil Apparatus in Indonesia in the Conception of Welfare State: A Study of Legal Material Law Number 5 Year 2014 on State Civil Apparatus. Asian Social Science, 15(3), 64.
Mulia, R. A. (2022). Systematic Literature Review: Analisis Tren dan Tantangan Dalam Perkembangan Desentralisasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekotrans & Erudisi, 2(2), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.69989/528eg697
Mulia, R. A., & Saputra, N. (2020). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Kota Padang. Jurnal El-Riyasah, 11(1), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.24014/jel.v11i1.10069
Ornstein, A. C. (2017). Social justice: History, purpose and meaning. Society, 54(6), 541–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-017-0188-8
Pramono, W., & Mulia, R. A. (2023). Village Government Policy in Reducing Poverty. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekotrans & Erudisi, 3(2), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.69989/2njzr944
Radin, M. J. (2017). Reconsidering the rule of law. In The Rule of Law and the Separation of Powers (pp. 37–76). Routledge.
Riwanto, A., & Suryaningsih, S. (2022). Realizing Welfare State and Social Justice: A Perspective on Islamic Law. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 41–51. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v5i1.6430
Rodrigues, S. (2022). Measuring legislation as a tool for better laws: the example of the Portuguese legislation observatory. Exploring the Province of Legislation: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives in Legisprudence, 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87262-5_8
Scott, C., Cafaggi, F., & Senden, L. (2011). The conceptual and constitutional challenge of transnational private regulation. Journal of Law and Society, 38(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2011.00532.x
Sugiyono, S. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. CV. Alfabeta.
Suryaningsih, S., Krisnawansyah, Y., Zamhasari, Z., Gafar, T. F., & Octavia, S. (2023). Analysis of the Village Head Replacement Mechanism Based on Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages and Derivative Regulations. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekotrans & Erudisi, 3(2), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.69989/yc477509
Turner, M., Prasojo, E., & Sumarwono, R. (2022). The challenge of reforming big bureaucracy in Indonesia. Policy Studies, 43(2), 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2019.1708301
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sayid Anshar, Netrivianti Netrivianti (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licensing Notice
Authors publishing in Jurnal Ilmiah Ekotrans & Erudisi (JIEE) retain copyright over their original scholarly works and grant the journal the right of first publication. Published articles are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
Under this license, users are permitted to copy, redistribute, share, reproduce, translate, adapt, and build upon the licensed material for any lawful purpose, including commercial use, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s), the initial publication in JIEE is acknowledged, a link to the license is provided, and any modifications are indicated. When adapted material is shared, the adaptation must comply with the applicable ShareAlike licensing requirements.
No additional permission from the authors or the journal is required for uses authorized by CC BY-SA 4.0. Users must not impose additional legal restrictions or technological measures that prevent others from exercising the rights granted by the license.
Authors may enter into separate, additional non-exclusive arrangements for the distribution of their published work, including deposit in institutional repositories, scholarly repositories, and academic websites, provided that the original publication in JIEE is appropriately acknowledged and the applicable licensing terms are respected.
Third-party materials that are expressly excluded from the article's Creative Commons license remain subject to their respective copyright and permission requirements. The license does not override applicable privacy, personality, or other rights.
For copyright-related inquiries or reports of possible infringement, please contact the JIEE Editorial Office.
Official License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
