Perikatan Bersyarat dalam Hukum Perdata Indonesia Implikasi dari Putusan Mahkamah Agung terhadap Praktik Bisnis

Penulis

  • Dwikornida Dwikornida Universitas Tamansiswa Padang Penulis
  • Syaifuddin Islam Universitas Tamansiswa Padang Penulis

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69989/fmfgxm52

Kata Kunci:

Kewajiban bersyarat, hukum perdata Indonesia, kepastian hukum, putusan Mahkamah Agung, kontrak bisnis, peraturan pemerintah, hukum internasional.

Abstrak

Kewajiban bersyarat adalah konsep dasar dalam hukum perdata Indonesia yang memberikan fleksibilitas dalam transaksi bisnis. Diatur dalam Pasal 1253 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata Indonesia, kewajiban ini memungkinkan pelaksanaan kontrak bergantung pada kondisi tertentu yang belum terjadi. Dalam praktik bisnis, kewajiban bersyarat sering diterapkan dalam perjanjian jual beli, kontrak bisnis internasional, dan transaksi yang melibatkan peraturan pemerintah. Salah satu aspek penting dari pelaksanaannya adalah kepastian hukum, yang ditekankan dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 218 PK/Pdt/2015, yang menyatakan bahwa perjanjian yang bergantung pada persetujuan pemerintah tidak dapat dilaksanakan sebelum memperoleh persetujuan tersebut. Analisis terhadap putusan ini menyoroti implikasi hukum penting dari kewajiban bersyarat, baik dalam memastikan perlindungan hukum maupun mengelola ketidakpastian dalam perjanjian bisnis. Studi komparatif dengan sistem hukum internasional, seperti hukum perdata Eropa dan hukum umum, mengungkapkan bahwa kewajiban bersyarat diakui secara luas sebagai instrumen hukum universal dalam kontrak bisnis. Oleh karena itu, pemahaman yang mendalam tentang kewajiban bersyarat sangat penting bagi praktisi bisnis dan profesional hukum untuk memastikan perjanjian yang efektif yang meminimalkan risiko dan mematuhi peraturan hukum yang berlaku.

Unduhan

Data unduhan tidak tersedia.

Referensi

Bartolini, F. (2017). Connected contracts within financing agreements: The case of the supplier’s non-fulfilment. Osservatorio Del Diritto Civile e Commerciale, 6(2), 469–502. https://doi.org/10.4478/88251

Benuf, K., & Azhar, M. (2020). Metodologi penelitian hukum sebagai instrumen mengurai permasalahan hukum kontemporer. Gema Keadilan, 7(1), 20–33.

Billows, S. (2019). CONTRACTS AS COMPLIANCE MECHANISMS: LEGAL INTERMEDIATION AND THE FAILURE OF FRENCH RETAIL REGULATION. Studies in Law Politics and Society, 81, 151–174. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1059-433720190000081007

Caldarelli, G. (2021). Unilateral Modification of Long Term Contracts: American Change of Terms Clauses and Italian Ius Variandi from a “Relational” Point of View. European Review of Contract Law, 17(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1515/ercl-2021-0002

Choi, A. H., & Triantis, G. (2020). Designing and enforcing preliminary agreements. Texas Law Review, 98(3), 439–488.

Crystal, N. M., & Giannoni-Crystal, F. (2010). Contract enforceability during economic crisis: Legal principles and drafting solutions. Global Jurist, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.2202/1934-2640.1367

De Andrade, F. S. (2016). The guarantee contract as a typical warranty business in Brazilian civil law. Revista de Derecho Privado, 31, 331–354. https://doi.org/10.18601/01234366.n31.11

De Sousa Gonçalves, A. S. (2017). Choice-of-court agreements in the e-commerce international contracts. Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology, 11(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.5817/MUJLT2017-1-4

Demirel, H. Ç., Leendertse, W., Volker, L., & Hertogh, M. (2017). Flexibility in PPP contracts–Dealing with potential change in the pre-contract phase of a construction project. Construction Management and Economics, 35(4), 196–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2016.1241414

Fandiño, M. B. (2018). Reflections on the framework contracts. Vniversitas, 67(136), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.vj136.rscm

Fathoni, M. Y., Sulistiyono, A., & Karjok, L. (2024). Reformulation of Sale And Purchase Agreement Regulations in Creating Legal Certainty and Justice in The Transfer of Land Rights in Indonesia. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 12(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v12i1.1351

Florey, K. (2020). Substance-targeted choice-of-law clauses. Virginia Law Review, 106(5), 1107–1181.

Garnero, A., Rycx, F., & Terraz, I. (2020). Productivity and Wage Effects of Firm-Level Collective Agreements: Evidence from Belgian Linked Panel Data. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 58(4), 936–972. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12525

Kölling, M. (2022). The role of (rule of law) conditionality in MFF 2021-2027 and Next Generation EU, or the stressed budget. Journal of Contemporary European Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2022.2059654

McManus, J. (2023). Transaction cost economics and mutual legal uncertainty to build commitment. Journal of Organization Design, 12(3), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41469-023-00149-7

Molica, F. (2024). Regional innovation policies and directionality: exploring the role of conditionality*. European Planning Studies, 32(8), 1653–1670. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2024.2362710

Mols, N. P. (2022). When to sign a contract: The timing of contractual commitments. Industrial Marketing Management, 104, 317–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.05.004

Moss, G. C. (2007). International contracts between common law and civil law: Is non-state law to be preferred? The difficulty of interpreting legal standards such as good faith. Global Jurist, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.2202/1934-2640.1189

Mulia, R. A., Saputra, N., Syamsir, S., & Embi, M. A. (2022). Literature Evaluation on Optimizing Supervisory Functions in Improving the Performance of Regional Government Bureaucracy. Adabi: Journal of Public Administration and Business, 9(2), 12–24.

Niculae, M., Strat, B.-T., & Gorun, D. (2018). Economic and legal aspects regarding the effects of unpredictability and its impact on credit contracts. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 15, 461–467.

Ryall, M. D., & Sampson, R. C. (2017). Contract structure for joint production: Risk and ambiguity under compensatory damages. Management Science, 63(4), 1232–1253. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2442

Saputra, N., Syamsir, S., Embi, M. A., & Mulia, R. A. (2023). Community Participation in Tourism Development at the Macaronis Tourism Attraction, Silabu Beach, Mentawai Islands. Adabi: Journal of Public Administration and Business, 10(1), 12–23.

Singh, R. (2012). Inefficiency and abuse of compulsory land acquisition: An enquiry into the way forward. Economic and Political Weekly, 47(19), 46–53.

Sobczak, A. (2007). Legal dimensions of international framework agreements in the field of corporate social responsibility. Relations Industrielles, 62(3), 466-491+566. https://doi.org/10.7202/016489ar

Soutullo, C. A. (2018). The condition in the contract. Registration in the property registry. Revista de Derecho Civil, 5(4), 281–331.

Thinus, P. (2024). The EU’s Transactional Approach to Rule of Law Spending Conditionality in the 2020s. Journal of Common Market Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13620

Yalçintaş, D. (2022). Invoking the Nullity of Non-compete Agreements in Employment Law: A Comparison of Turkish and Belgian Law. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 38(3), 331–358. https://doi.org/10.54648/ijcl2022015

Yarni, M., & Amanda, K. R. (2024). Conditional Unconstitutionality Arrangements in the Authority of Formal Judicial Review of Laws Against the Constitution. Jurnal Konstitusi, 21(4), 635–655. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2146

Zydney Mannheimer, M. J. (2020). Vagueness as impossibility. Texas Law Review, 98(6), 1049–1114.

Diterbitkan

2024-12-28

Terbitan

Bagian

Articles

Cara Mengutip

Perikatan Bersyarat dalam Hukum Perdata Indonesia Implikasi dari Putusan Mahkamah Agung terhadap Praktik Bisnis. (2024). Jurnal Ilmiah Ekotrans & Erudisi, 4(2), 63-73. https://doi.org/10.69989/fmfgxm52

Artikel Serupa

1-10 dari 37

Anda juga bisa Mulai pencarian similarity tingkat lanjut untuk artikel ini.