Analysis of Disaster Management Systems in Tsunami Shelter Management in Padang City

Authors

  • Tirza Haqia Purnama Universitas Andalas Author
  • Egi Zulfarayani Universitas Andalas Author
  • Edi Hasymi Universitas Andalas Author
  • Roni Ekha Putera Universitas Andalas Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69989/cgvaf511

Keywords:

Tsunami evacuation shelter, Vertical evacuation, Disaster management system, Readiness assurance

Abstract

Padang City, Indonesia, faces near-field tsunami risk where evacuation time is severely limited, making vertical evacuation shelters critical life-safety infrastructure. This study analyzes the disaster management system underpinning tsunami shelter management in Padang using a qualitative case study design. Data were drawn from policy and planning documents, the BPBD Padang shelter inventory (2019), and the BPBD tsunami evacuation plan map (2025), and analyzed through thematic analysis with source triangulation. Results indicate four systemic issues: (1) fragmented shelter definitions and incomplete inventories that weaken capacity planning; (2) a pronounced readiness assurance gap, where large nominal capacity (~53,874 people) coexists with feasibility-testing status recorded as “not yet conducted” for key shelters; (3) partial operational integration between shelters, evacuation routes, warning devices, and routine drills; and (4) governance challenges arising from a multi-owner shelter portfolio requiring clear accountability, access guarantees, and sustainable maintenance. The study contributes a readiness assurance lens that distinguishes nominal shelter availability from verified operational readiness and offers actionable implications: establishing a unified shelter registry, institutionalizing feasibility evaluation and recertification, strengthening end-to-end integration with evacuation operations, and formalizing governance instruments for privately owned shelters. These findings highlight that effective tsunami shelter management depends on governing shelters as safety-critical socio-technical systems rather than static assets.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

Chen, C., Mostafizi, A., Wang, H., Cox, D., & Cramer, L. (2022). Evacuation behaviors in tsunami drills. Natural Hazards, 112(1), 845–871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05208-y

Dias, N., Haigh, R., Amaratunga, D., & Rahayu, H. (2024). A review of tsunami early warning at the local level - Key actors, dissemination pathways, and remaining challenges. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104195

Fathianpour, A., Evans, B., Jelodar, M. B., & Wilkinson, S. (2023). Tsunami evacuation modelling via micro-simulation model. Progress in Disaster Science, 17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2023.100277

Flick, U. (2018). Doing triangulation and mixed methods.

Harnantyari, A. S., Takabatake, T., Esteban, M., Valenzuela, P., Nishida, Y., Shibayama, T., Achiari, H., Marzuki, A. G., Marzuki, M. F. H., Aránguiz, R., & Kyaw, T. O. (2020). Tsunami awareness and evacuation behaviour during the 2018 Sulawesi Earthquake tsunami. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101389

K Robert, Y. (2018). Case study research and applications design and methods.

Kitamura, F., Inazu, D., Ikeya, T., & Okayasu, A. (2020). An allocating method of tsunami evacuation routes and refuges for minimizing expected casualties. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101519

Korstjens, I., & Moser, A. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 120–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092

Kubisch, S., Guth, J., Keller, S., Bull, M. T., Keller, L., & Braun, A. C. (2020). The contribution of tsunami evacuation analysis to evacuation planning in Chile: Applying a multi-perspective research design. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101462

Mas, E., Moya, L., Gonzales, E., & Koshimura, S. (2024). Reinforcement learning-based tsunami evacuation guidance system. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.105023

McCaughey, J. W., Mundir, I., Daly, P., Mahdi, S., & Patt, A. (2017). Trust and distrust of tsunami vertical evacuation buildings: Extending protection motivation theory to examine choices under social influence. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 24, 462–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.06.016

Mls, K., Kořínek, M., Štekerová, K., Tučník, P., Bureš, V., Čech, P., Husáková, M., Mikulecký, P., Nacházel, T., Ponce, D., Zanker, M., Babič, F., & Triantafyllou, I. (2023). Agent-based models of human response to natural hazards: systematic review of tsunami evacuation. Natural Hazards, 115(3), 1887–1908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05643-x

Mostafizi, A., Wang, H., Cox, D., & Dong, S. (2019). An agent-based vertical evacuation model for a near-field tsunami: Choice behavior, logical shelter locations, and life safety. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 34, 467–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.12.018

Muhammad, A., De Risi, R., De Luca, F., Mori, N., Yasuda, T., & Goda, K. (2021). Are current tsunami evacuation approaches safe enough? Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 35(4), 759–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-021-02000-5

Muhammad, A., Goda, K., Alexander, N. A., Kongko, W., & Muhari, A. (2017). Tsunami evacuation plans for future megathrust earthquakes in Padang, Indonesia, considering stochastic earthquake scenarios. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 17(12), 2245–2270. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-2245-2017

Nakai, H., Itatani, T., & Horiike, R. (2021). Construction of an evacuee placement model for tsunami shelters considering physical distancing to prevent COVID-19 infection. Progress in Disaster Science, 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2021.100183

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

O’Brien, B. C., Harris, I. B., Beckman, T. J., Reed, D. A., & Cook, D. A. (2014). Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Academic Medicine, 89(9), 1245–1251.

Ophiyandri, T., Istijono, B., Hidayat, B., & Yunanda, R. (2022). Readiness Analysis of Public Buildings in Padang City for Tsunami Temporary Evacuation Shelter. International Journal of GEOMATE, 22(94), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.21660/2022.94.j2391

Rafliana, I., Jalayer, F., Cerase, A., Cugliari, L., Baiguera, M., Salmanidou, D., Necmioğlu, Ö., Ayerbe, I. A., Lorito, S., & Fraser, S. (2022). Tsunami risk communication and management: Contemporary gaps and challenges. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 70, 102771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102771

Saputra, N., Putera, R. E., & Zetra, A. (2025). Innovative capacity building strategies for sustainable disaster risk management: a systematic review, conceptual framework, and future research directions. E3S Web of Conferences, 604. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202560403004

Sun, M.-C., Sakai, K., Chen, A. Y., & Hsu, Y.-T. (2022). Location problems of vertical evacuation structures for dam-failure floods: Considering shelter-in-place and horizontal evacuation. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103044

Sun, Y., & Sun, J. (2019). Perception, preparedness, and response to tsunami risks in an aging society: Evidence from Japan. Safety Science, 118, 466–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.05.060

Wang, Z., & Jia, G. (2021). Simulation-Based and Risk-Informed Assessment of the Effectiveness of Tsunami Evacuation Routes Using Agent-Based Modeling: A Case Study of Seaside, Oregon. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 13(1), 66–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-021-00387-x

Wang, Z., & Jia, G. (2022). Risk-informed evaluation of tsunami evacuation risk mitigation strategies. Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure, 7(6), 1008–1027. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2022.2127270

Zhang, W., Wu, J., & Yun, Y. (2019). Strategies for increasing tsunami shelter accessibility to enhance hazard risk adaptive capacity in coastal port cities: A study of Nagoya city, Japan. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 19(4), 927–940. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-927-2019

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Analysis of Disaster Management Systems in Tsunami Shelter Management in Padang City. (2025). Jurnal Ilmiah Ekotrans & Erudisi, 5(2), 139-157. https://doi.org/10.69989/cgvaf511

Similar Articles

1-10 of 50

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)