From Issue to Policy: Agenda Setting in Padang City Spatial Planning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69989/9k5spn63Keywords:
Agenda Setting, Public Policy, Spatial Planning, Development Planning Politics, Economic PoliticsAbstract
Regional spatial planning is a strategic public policy involving various interests and actors with a long-term orientation. However, in practice, spatial planning policies often face inconsistencies between regulatory objectives and regional development dynamics. This article aims to analyse the agenda-setting process in Padang City's spatial planning policy by examining how public issues are constructed, prioritised, and formulated into policy through the Padang City Regional Spatial Plan (RTRW) for 2010–2030. This research uses a qualitative approach, utilising a case study method. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, document studies, and policy tracing. The analysis was conducted using the concept of Agenda Setting Stages by Andersin and the concept of Agenda Setting by Nikolaos Zahariadis to explain and understand the patterns of interaction and interrelationship between official (within the government) and unofficial (outside the government) actors in policy formulation. The results indicate that the spatial planning agenda in Padang City is shaped by the dynamics of interactions among government, political, and non-governmental actors, with a dominant focus on economic development and investment interests. Development processes tend to prioritise technocratic and political considerations, while disaster mitigation and public interest are often neglected. These findings confirm that the agenda-setting process plays a crucial role in determining the direction and quality of regional spatial planning policies and has implications for the consistency of spatial planning policy implementation.
Downloads
References
Afrizal. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Sebuah Upaya Mendukung Penggunaan Penelitian Kualitatif dalam Berbagai Disiplin Ilmu. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Albrechts, L. (2004). Strategic (spatial) planning reexamined. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31(5), 743–758. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1068/b3065
Aminah, S. (2016). Konflik dan Kontestasi Penataan Ruang Kota Surabaya. Masyarakat: Jurnal Sosiologi, 20(1), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.7454/mjs.v20i1.4751
Anderson, J. (1984). Public Policy Making. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Anggraini, N. (2010). Ruang Publik dalam Perancangan Kota. In Yayasan Humaniora (Vol. 59). Yayasan Humaniora.
Annas, A., & Rusnaedy, Z. (2020). Evaluasi Kebijakan Tata Ruang Dan Bangunan Reklamasi Pantai Metro Tanjung Bunga Kota Makassar. Journal of Government Civil Society, 3(2), 115–129. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/jgcs.v3i2.1948
Bacău, S., Grădinaru, S. R., & Hersperger, A. M. (2020). Spatial Plans As Relational Data: Using Social Network Analysis To Assess Consistency Among Bucharest’s Planning Instruments. Land Use Policy, 92, 104484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104484
Bappeda Kota Padang. (2019). Analisis Pengembangan Ekonomo Regional Kota Padang Dalam Menghadapi MEA Dan Kota Padang Sebagai Kota Metropolitan. Pemerintah Kota Padang.
Beta, A. A. (2017). Perencanaan Tata Ruang Wilayah Bagi Kesejahteraan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Cano Ekonomos, 6(1), pp 1-6.
Cobb, R. W., & Elder, C. D. (1971). The politics of agenda-building: An alternative perspective for modern democratic theory. The Journal of Politics, 33(4), 892–915.
Creswell, John W. & Poth, C. N. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among 5 Approaches. In Sage Publication (3rd ed.). Vicki Knight.
Déjeant, M.-P. (2010). Council of Europe Conference of Ministers responsible for Spatial/Regional Planning (CEMAT) (Issue 3). Council of Europe Publishing.
Dinda, R., Mariati, H., & Fitriawan, D. (2022). Analisis Proyeksi Penduduk dan Alokasi Kebutuhan Lahan Pemukiman di Kota Padang 2020-2030. Jurnal Azimut, 4(1), 19–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1234/jaz.v4i1.790
Djunire, S., Haselman, J. N., & Ahmad, B. (2018). The implementation of regional spatial planning policy in Manokwari Regency. European Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 6(4), 29–35.
Geraldy, G. (2017). Determinasi Kapitalisme Industri dalam Politik Penataan Ruang Perkotaan di Kabupaten Gresik. Jurnal Pemikiran Sosiologi, 4(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.22146/jps.v4i1.23624
Gregorio, M. Di, Fatorelli, L., Paavola, J., Locatelli, B., Pramova, E., Nurrochmat, D. R., May, P. H., Brockhaus, M., Sari, I. M., & Kusumadewi, S. D. (2019). Multi-Level Governance And Power In Climate Change Policy Networks. Global Environmental Change, 54, 64–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.10.003
Hakim, A. L. (2019). Analisis Aktor Yang Berperan Dan Mempengaruhi Implementasi Kebijakan Tata Ruang : Studi Di Kabupaten Pandeglang. The Indonesian Journal of Public Administration (IJPA), 5(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.52447/ijpa.v5i1.1647
Hakim, A. L., Kolopaking, L. M., Siregar, H., & Putri, E. I. K. (2017). Struggle for Resources Water: Analysis Conflict and Politics of Spatial Planning. Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan, 5(2), 81–91. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22500/sodality.v5i2.17901
HarianHaluan. (2017). Wujudkan Kota Metropolitan, Padang Mesti Banyak Berbenah. Harian Haluan.
Hasnati, H., Yalid, Y., & Febrina, R. (2018). Dampak Kebijakan Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Terhadap Iklim Investasi Bidang Usaha Perkebunan di Provinsi Riau. Jurnal Hukum Respublica, 16(2), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.31849/respublica.v16i2.1441
Hidayat, B. F., Asrinaldi, A., & Putera, R. E. (2023). Agenda Setting dalam Penataan Ruang di Kota Padang (Studi Kebijakan Perda No. 4 Tahun 2012 tentang Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Kota Padang Tahun 2010-2030). Jurnal Birokrasi & Pemerintahan Daerah, 5(4), 182–198.
I’aannah, F., & Tri Widodo, A. (2021). Degradasi Fungsi Legislasi Dprd Dalam Sentralisasi Kebijakan Penetapan Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Di Kabupaten/Kota. Jurnal Jendela Inovasi Daerah, 4(2), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.56354/jendelainovasi.v4i2.103
Kingdon, J. W., & Stano, E. (2013). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (Pearson ne). Pearson, Harlow. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.4050050316
L.H, M. T., & Hasyim, S. (2017). Analisis Qanun Nomor 2 Tahun 2018 Mengenai Kawasan Pasar Rukoh Yang Tidak Termasuk Kedalam Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Kota (Rtrwk) Banda Aceh. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bidang Hukum Kenegaraan, 5(4), 37–52.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production Of Space. In D. N.- Smith (Ed.), Basil Blackwell. Basil Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315565125-7
Lindblom, C. E. (1980). Proses Penetapan Kebijakan (terjemahan) (Syamsudin Ardian (ed.); 2nd ed.). Erlangga.
Moleong, L. J. (2007). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mortensen, P. B. (2010). Political Attention and Public Policy : A Study of How Agenda Setting Matters. Nordic Political Science Association, 33(4), 356–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2010.00254.x
Muhajir, A. (2017). Kebijakan Pengendalian Pemanfaatan Ruang Dalam Pelaksanaan Ketentuan Penataan Ruang Di Kota Baubau Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara. Jurnal Renaissance, 2(2), 184–193.
Musyafir, Astomo, P., & Rasyid, F. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Kebijakan Pemerintah Kabupaten Mamuju Terkait Penataanruang Wilayah. Jurnal Hukum Unsulbar, 2(1), 32–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31605/j-law.v2i1.590
Nafiah, M., Ati, N. U., & Suyeno, S. (2022). Evaluasi Kebijakan Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Kota Batu Tahun 2010-2030. Jurnal Respon Publik, 16(6), 19–27.
Putera, R. E., Valentina, T. R., & Rosa, S. A. S. (2020). Implementasi Kebijakan Penataan Ruang Berbasis Mitigasi Bencana Sebagai Upaya Pengurangan Resiko Bencana di Kota Padang. Publik (Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi), 9(2), 155. https://doi.org/10.31314/pjia.9.2.155-167.2020
Ruang Direktorat Jenderal Penataan. (2003). Sejarah Penataan Ruang di Indonesia. Direktorat Jenderal Penataan Ruang.
Salim, M. (2017). Analisis Kebijakan Pengadaan Ruang Terbuka Hijau melalui Perda Nomor 10 Tahun 2012 tentang Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Kabupaten Tegal Tahun 2012-2032. Journal of Politic and Government Studies, 6(2), 311–320.
Sitorus, O. (2015). Konsolidasi Tanah, Tata Ruang, dan Ketahanan Nasional. STPN Press.
Stewart Jr, J., Hedge, D., & Lester, J. P. (2007). Public policy: An evolutionary approach (3rd Editio). Wadsworth.
Suharyo, S. (2017). Problematika Penegakan Hukum Penataan Ruang Dalam Pelaksanaan Otonomi Daerah. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 6(2), 171. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v6i2.185
Sulmiah, S., Sakawati, H., Widyawati, W., & Rukmana, N. S. (2019). Analisis Kebijakan Pembangunan Kawasan Metropolitan Di Indonesia Timur: Dampak terhadap Tata Kelola Perkotaan. In Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi (Vol. 16, Issue 2, pp. 258–272). https://doi.org/10.31113/jia.v16i2.519
Surchaman, F., & Saputri, E. (2017). Implementasi Kebijakan Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Kabupaten Pamekasan Dalam Perspektif Sustainable Development. 2(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.53712/aspirasi.v2i1.129
Suwitri, S. (2011). Jejaring Kebijakan Publik: Kerangka Baru Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan (p. 51). Universitas Diponegoro.
Takwim, S., & Herman, S. R. W. (2021). Kebijakan Tata Ruang Berbasis Inklusifitas Aktor. Government: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 14(2), 97–103.
Yin, R. K. (2008). Studi Kasus, Desain dan Metode. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Zahariadis, N. (2016). Handbook of public policy agenda setting. In Handbook of Public Policy Agenda Setting. Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784715922
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Billy Febrima Hidayat, Asrinaldi Asrinaldi, Roni Ekha Putera (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licensing Notice
Authors publishing in Jurnal Ilmiah Ekotrans & Erudisi (JIEE) retain copyright over their original scholarly works and grant the journal the right of first publication. Published articles are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
Under this license, users are permitted to copy, redistribute, share, reproduce, translate, adapt, and build upon the licensed material for any lawful purpose, including commercial use, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s), the initial publication in JIEE is acknowledged, a link to the license is provided, and any modifications are indicated. When adapted material is shared, the adaptation must comply with the applicable ShareAlike licensing requirements.
No additional permission from the authors or the journal is required for uses authorized by CC BY-SA 4.0. Users must not impose additional legal restrictions or technological measures that prevent others from exercising the rights granted by the license.
Authors may enter into separate, additional non-exclusive arrangements for the distribution of their published work, including deposit in institutional repositories, scholarly repositories, and academic websites, provided that the original publication in JIEE is appropriately acknowledged and the applicable licensing terms are respected.
Third-party materials that are expressly excluded from the article's Creative Commons license remain subject to their respective copyright and permission requirements. The license does not override applicable privacy, personality, or other rights.
For copyright-related inquiries or reports of possible infringement, please contact the JIEE Editorial Office.
Official License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
